I’m reading this story about a toll road, which coincidentally will, at some point when the shouting’s done, run along the backside of town and be, almost certainly, two things:
- A much-needed road, alleviating traffic through southern Orange County, which has become a much greater problem than you’d think due to explosive growth over the last 15 years.
- A total environmental/financial/surfing/social/city-planning (pick at least two) boondoggle and travesty.
It sucks, because the road really is necessary, and there’s no way to put it further north (suburbs) or south (marine base); or east (TRW has a big facility where they…do something) or west (the aforementioned suburbs). So it will eventually be placed right about where they’ve been planning to since about 1982, which will destroy a creek that is a habitat for endangered animals, run about 100 yards from a heretofore-remote campground, and for bonus points, runs the risk of destroying one of the 10 best surf spots in the world.
And of course, in Southern California as anywhere else (though particularly here—the developers run the show to a degree that must be seen to be believed), more roads mean development along those roads. So more suburbs, more strip malls, more soulless dead-eyed bovine suburb-dwellers, breeding the next generation of strip-mall workers are a certainty.
So I’m conflicted. Getting traffic off the road = a moderate good. The attendant costs of that traffic alleviation are a shame. And all this is to say nothing of my feelings (echoed by many long-time residents), which are that more soullessly perfect suburbs (and the strip malls and megachurches to support them) at the back of the city detract from the town’s quiet ambience of a goofy little beach town.
But while reading the article, mulling over the implications of the above, while lamenting the shameful stifle-the-dissent attitude practiced by The Powers That Be, all I could really concentrate on is that Clint Eastwood is seventy-seven years old.